Chelsea Stockton v. Microsoft Inc et al
| Chelsea Stockton |
| Does and Microsoft Inc |
| 2:2012cv00022 |
| January 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Contract: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to Lee A. Weiss for Plaintiff Chelsea Stockton. Your Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application; no filing fee is required. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chelsea Stockton. (et) (mg). |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Microsoft Inc. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi.(Filing fee $ 350 Paid.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Chelsea Stockton. (et) (mg). |
| 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant Microsoft Inc. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
