Pete Allen v. City of Burbank et al
| Pete Allen |
| City of Burbank, City of Burbank Police Department, Doe Officers and Does |
| 2:2012cv00152 |
| January 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 11/27/2012, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend, allowing Plaintiff 15 days within which to file an amended complaint 18 . Plaintiff having failed to file an amended complaint, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: (see attached) In any event, it appears that plaintiff may be in violation of Local Rule 73-2.2, as, assuming the Complaint was serve d prior to the filing of the Motion to Dismiss, he has failed to file a proof of service of the summons and complaint within 10 days of service. Accordingly, no later than April 19, 2012, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to follow the Local Rules. Filing of the proof of service by April 19, 2012, shall be deemed compliance with this Order. The hearing on defendants' Motion to Dismiss is hereby continued to May 8, 2012. (jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
