Judith O Hollinger v. Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company et al
Judith O Hollinger |
Good Samaritan Medical Practice Association Health Plan, Good Samaritan Medical Practice Association Inc a Medical Group, Advanced Medical Management Inc and Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company |
2:2012cv00396 |
January 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald S.W. Lew |
Michael R. Wilner |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, re: Stipulation to Dismiss Party 77 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dv) |
Filing 59 JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew 28 54 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Advanced Medical Management, Inc. ("Defendant") and against Plaintiff Judith O. Hollinger. Defendant shall recover the costs of suit, in accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). (jre) |
Filing 57 STATEMENT OF UNCONTROVERTED FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Re: Defendant California Physicians' Service d.b.a. Blue Shield of California 27 signed by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. After consideration of Defendant California Physicians Service d.b.a. Blue Shield of California 27 , this Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.