Alex Rosas et al v. Leroy Baca et al
| Jonathan Goodwin and Alex Rosas |
| Leroy Baca, Dennis Burns, Cecil Rhambo and Paul Tanaka |
| 2:2012cv00428 |
| January 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
292
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO UNSEAL COURT RECORDS, 276 , [268, 269] by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Movants Motion to Unseal is GRANTED.6 The six redacted videos lodged under seal by Defendants on November 7, 2023 (Dkt. 291) are hereby ordered unsealed. Th e following sealed documents are also hereby ordered unsealed; (1) Plaintiffs' memorandum of Points and authorities in support of Motion to Modify Implementaion Plan (Dkt. 255); (20 Declaration of Stephen Sinclair (Dkt. 255-1); (30 Declaration o f Raymond Dunn (Dkt. 255-3); (40 Declaration of Shamsher Samra (Dkt. 255-6); (5) Declaration of Matthew Thomas (Dkt 255-7); (6) Plaintiff's Reply Brief, (Dkt. 262); (7) Declaration of Matthew Thomas (Dkt. 262-1); (8) Declaration of Stephen Sincl air (Dkt.262-2); (9) Declaration of Melissa Camacho (Dkt. 262-3); and (10) Declaration of MarisolDominguez-Ruiz (Dkt 262-4). Furthermore, the following lodged documents are ordered to be filed: (1) Plaintiffs Supplemental Statement in Response to Court Order (Dkt. 285-1); and (2) Amended Declaration of Erin Bigler (Dkt 285-2). IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
|
Filing
279
ORDER RE MOTIONS TO INTERVENE AMD UNSEAL, 268 , 269 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The motions to intervene are, therefore, GRANTED, pursuant to Rule 24(b). A separate Order shall issue with respect to Movants motions to unseal the Sealed Materials. At argument, Movants indicated that they would not object to redactions of certain information in the Videos. Defendants, for their part, indicated that they would not object to the unsealing of at least one of the Videos. With that understanding , the court is inclined to grant Movants motionsto unseal, subject to the following: Defendants shall, within 21 days of the date of this Order, lodge with the court a set of edited Videos pixelated, cropped, or otherwise redacted to the minimum ex tent necessary to address any privacy or security concerns (the Edited Videos). Such alterations shall not obscure or diminish any depictions of uses of force. Plaintiffs and Defendants may lodge, along with the set of Edited Videos, a Joint Stateme nt providing additional contextual information about any or all of the Videos. Although the court prefers that Plaintiffs and Defendants agree on any such commentary, the parties may, if necessary, submit separate additional statements. The court then anticipates issuing an Order releasing the Edited Videos shortly thereafter. IT IS SO ORDERED. (shb)
|
|
Filing
193
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CLASS COUNSELS ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. See order for details. (shb)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER GOVERNING THE DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (See Order for details) re Stipulation for Protective Order 144 (vm)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE TERMS OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, DISMISSING ACTION (SEE DOCUMENT RE APPOINTMENT OF EXPERT PANEL TO DEVELOP AND EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND CLASS COUNSEL FEES AND EXPENSES OF $950,000.00. AND FOR OTHER SPECIFICS THEREIN). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 130 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) Modified on 4/21/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
84
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson re Stipulation for Protective Order 83 (lc)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 20 AND DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 36 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Request to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' Complaint 19 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Tanaka, Rhambo, and Burns are dismissed. All hyperlinks in Plaintiffs' Complaint are stricken. Plaintiffs shall file a complaint in accordance with this order forthwith. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
