James Bozajian v. County of Los Angeles et al
James Bozajian |
John Zajec, Jacquelyn Lacey, Sharon Matsumoto, Janet Moore, Curtis Hazell, Steve Cooley, County of Los Angeles, Does and John Spillane |
2:2012cv00625 |
January 24, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The parties to SHOW CAUSE by December 2, 2013, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. This order to show cause will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation to dismiss and a proposed order of dismissal. (lc) |
Filing 81 ORDER RE STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY 80 ; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:In light of the parties stipulation, the Court hereby VACATES all remaining hearings and dates. (ECF No. 80.) The Court also ORDERS the parties to SHOW CAUSE by August 30, 2013, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. This order to show cause will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation to dismiss and a proposed order of dismissal. (lc) |
Filing 45 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS CONVERTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 41 , MOTION TO DISMISS 34 , AND MOTION TO STRIKE 35 . Defendants shall file their answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of this order by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) . Modified on 1/29/2013 (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.