Ani Avedisian v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al
| Ani Avedisian |
| Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and Does |
| 2:2012cv00936 |
| February 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
AMENDED JUDGMENT 141 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Pursuant to the Court's Amended Order re Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on 9/8/2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, and against Plaintiff Ani Avedisian. (gk)
|
|
Filing
141
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Pursuant to the Courts Order re Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on September 5, 2014, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, and against Plaintiff Ani Avedisian. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kti)
|
|
Filing
53
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. **SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS** (dt)
|
|
Filing
43
PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRESERVE THE SUBJECT VEHICLE by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. ***[NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: For good cause shown, plaintiff Ani Avedisian ("plaintiff") and her agents, employees, attor neys, consultants, and /or representatives are hereby prohibited for a period of six months, from destroying, disabling, tampering with, modifying, altering, selling or otherwise disposing of plaintiff's 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS500 vehicle (the "Subject Vehicle"), the central focus of this litigation, including any parts or components that have been removed from the Subject Vehicle and that are in the possession, custody, or control of plaintiff or her agents, employees, attorneys, consultants and/or representatives. 33 [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] (gr)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 11/19/2012, the Court found that Plaintiff has standing to pursue claims relating to the alleged defects in her vehicle. The Court als o notified the parties of its intent to convert Defendant's motion to dismiss 17 to a motion for partial summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claim for breach of express warranty. Partial summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claim for br each of express warranty is GRANTED. Defendant's motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff's remaining claims is DENIED. Defendant's motion to strike class allegations is DENIED. Defendant shall file an Answer within 15 days of the date of this Order. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
