Fang L Huang v. Craig Miller et al
Plaintiff: Fang L Huang
Defendant: Toxic Epidemiology Program of LA Dept of Public Health, Does, G and K Management Co Inc, Jennifer Hecox, Craig Miller and Bureau of District Survillance and Enforcement
Case Number: 2:2012cv00943
Filed: February 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Motions to Strike 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 . The Court GRANTS defendant County of Los Angeles's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims for negligence and violations of sections 1983, 1985, and 1986 44 . The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining claims, and therefore DISMISSES all other claims without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
June 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Defendant G&K's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike 29 ; Defendant Hecox's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike 30 ; Defendant Miller's Motion to Dismiss and Mo tion to Strike 11 ; Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 18 . The Court hereby DENIES defendant G&K's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, GRANTS its motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim w ithout prejudice, and DENIES its motion to strike as moot. The Court hereby DENIES defendant Hecox's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, GRANTS her motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim without prejudice and DENIE S her motion to strike as moot. The Court hereby DENIES defendant Miller's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, GRANTS his motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim without prejudice, and DENIES his motion to strike as moot. The Court DENIES plaintiff's motion for leave to amend as moot. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies noted herein within 30 days. The Court admonishes plaintiff that failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in the dismissal of her case with prejudice. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The only federal claim asserted by plaintiff is that defendants violated 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983 et seq. vis a vis their alleged violation of Cal. Health & Safety Code Section 26105 (failure to repair premises and disclose defects). However, plaintiff has not pointed to any federal civil right that defendants may have violated. Nor has plaintiff cited a ny authority suggesting that a state actor's general failure to provide a service amounts to a civil rights violation. Accordingly, because the complaint does not appear to assert a federal question pursuant to Section 1983, this Court appears to lack jurisdiction to entertain this action. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE on or before 3/22/2012, why the instant action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fang L Huang v. Craig Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toxic Epidemiology Program of LA Dept of Public Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G and K Management Co Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Hecox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of District Survillance and Enforcement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fang L Huang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?