Edward Paragin v. Oreck Corporation et al
Edward Paragin |
Oreck Corporation and Oreck Direct, LLC |
2:2012cv00951 |
February 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E. McDermott |
Christina A. Snyder |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Parties, by and through their counsel, have stipulated that the entire action be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice as to the claims of the named Plaintiffs. IT IS SO ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE-ENTITLED MATTER BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE CLAIMS OF THE NAMED PLAINTIFFS. (gk) |
Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONSOLIDATING ACTION AND APPOINTING LEAD INTERIM CLASS COUNSEL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 2/27/2012, Plaintiffs' counsel in the Chenier, Edge, Latta, Ruscitti, and Paragin actions filed a Motion for Appointment of Kirtland & Packard LLP as Interim Class Counsel. The six cases transferred by the MDL Panel ML No. 12-2317 CAS (JEMx) [CV 11-05321 CAS (JEMx); EDCV 11-01082 CAS (JEMx); CV 11-08725 CAS (JEMx); CV 12-00949 CAS (JEMx); CV 12-00950 CAS (JEMx); CV 12- 00951 CAS (JEMx)] are consolidated for pretrial purposes only. Kirtland & Packard is hereby appointed lead interim class counsel. The parties are ordered to meet and confer to discuss a case organization structure that is consistent with this order. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.