Cole Asia Business Center Inc v. Robert D Manning et al
Cole Asia Business Center Inc |
Debtorwise Foundation, Does and Robert D Manning |
2:2012cv00956 |
February 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Carla Woehrle |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ACCESSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING JOINDER 78 , 80 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 6/18/2013 (lc). |
Filing 98 AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTER/THIRD PARTY CLAIMANT DEEBTORWISES MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AURORA TALAVERA AND THE AURORA LAW GROUP AS COUNSEL FOR THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT ACCESS COUNSELING, INC. 57 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 6/5/2013 (lc). |
Filing 96 ORDER DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE 93 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Defendant,Counterclaimant/Third Party Claimant Robert D. Mannings Ex Parte Motion for a 120 day continuance of the trial and all related dates so that he can secure le gal representation and so that his new counsel has sufficient time to prepare for trial. The court DENIES the motion. Dr. Manning has been aware of the need to obtain new counsel at least since April 24, 2013, and most likely before that date. The co urt finds that the case is not so complex as to require a continuance of the trial date, which is over seven weeks away, and that Dr. Mannings new counsel will have sufficient time to prepare without altering the trial date at this stage in the proceedings. (lc). Modified on 6/4/2013. (lc). |
Filing 70 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTER/THIRD PARTY CLAIMANT DEEBTORWISES MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AURORA TALAVERA AND THE AURORA LAW GROUP AS COUNSEL FOR THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT ACCESS COUNSELING, INC. 57 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc). Modified on 10/30/2012 (lc). |
Filing 66 INTERIM STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle. [Note changes made by court] In connection with the production of documents made pursuant to this interim protective order, the parties shall designate documents, or other information derived therefrom, as "Confidential" under the terms of this Interim Stipulated Protective Order (hereinafter "Order"). [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] 62 (gr) |
Filing 59 ORDER DENYING Counter-Defendant Access Counseling Inc.s MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS 35 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc) Modified on 8/16/2012 (lc). |
Filing 23 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson:The parties are therefore ordered to file cross-briefs, not to exceed ten pages, by no later than Monday, April 16, 2012, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for improper venue. The parties should also deliver a courtesy copy to chambers, Room 244-J, Second Floor, 312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles. If a partydoes not file a brief, the court will regard the party as not opposing dismissal of this matter. (lc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.