Wilden Pump and Engineering LLC v. JDA Global LLC et al
| Wilden Pump and Engineering LLC |
| Sam Featherston, JDA Global LLC, Nomad, Does, John D Allen and Thomas Brown |
| 2:2012cv01051 |
| February 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Otis D Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: striking 63 defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.The stipulation to calendar the hearing on this motion 65 is DENIED. (lc). Modified on 12/17/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 41 by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc). Modified on 10/30/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION requesting that the scheduling conference date be continued to 7/30/12 33 . In addition the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than 6/25/2012 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for failure to file timely Rule 26(f) report. The OSC may be discharged by the filing of a joint Rule 26(f) report. The July 2, 2012 scheduling conference is hereby VACATED, and no appearances are necessary. Should the Court receive a joint Rule 26(f) report on or before June 25, 2012, the Court will prepare a Scheduling and Case Management Order based on that report by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
