Howard v. Farmers Insurance Company Inc et al
Derrick Howard |
Thomas J Byrne, Mitchell W Crawford, Thomas V Eisele, Farmers Insurance Company Inc, William R Hawkinson, Doren E Hohl, Paul N Hopkins, Kevin E Kelso, Kory R Loebig, Mark R McKee, Mid-Century Insurance Company, Bryan F Murphy, Ronald G Myhan, Mhayse G Samalya, Gregor G Scott, Charles T Snyder, Frank A Soldano, Jim W Swope and Mark S Toohey |
2:2012cv01068 |
February 8, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Other Statutory Actions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 235 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson DENYING MOTION FOR TESTIMONY BY CONTEMPORANEOUS TRANSMISSION AND MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND TAKE EXPEDITED VIDEOTAPED TRIAL DEPOSITION. Plaintiffs Motion for Testimony by Contemporaneous Transmisions, Dk t 208 and Plaintiffs Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and Take Expedited Videotaped Trial Deposition, Dkt, 216 are DENIED. However, Plaintiff is granted leave to refile his Motion to Modify Scheduling Order and take expedited Videotaped Trial Depos ition, Dkt 216 with the addition of corroborating evidence, including declarations by witnesses James Tate, Carolyn Jackson, Sharon Money and Vernado Howard attesting to the circumstances of their unavailability, within 60 (sixty) days of this Order, or by March 30, 2018. No further continuances shall be granted. (shb) |
Filing 202 PRE-TRIAL ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court adopts the following pre-trial order to resolve the manner of Plaintiff Derrick Howards appearance at trial in this matter. For the reasons stated above, the court declines to issue a writ of h abeas corpus ad testificandum to secure Plaintiffs physical presence at trial. Instead, the court hereby orders that Plaintiff be made available to appear for trial in this matter by live videoconference. (See order for further details) IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) |
Filing 147 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson DENYING MOTION for Order Deeming Plaintiff Derrick Howard a Vexatious Litigant 105 . (jp) |
Filing 133 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS (1)RENEWED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR TAKING DISCOVERY; (2) MOTION TO DEEM DENIED DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE DENIED; (3) MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DE FENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS (4) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT AND OR AMEND PLAINTIFF INITIAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING PLAINTIFF DERRICK HOWARD A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT 126 , 127 , 129 , 130 ,and also 106 , 111 , 120 (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (lc). Modified on 9/14/2015 (lc). |
Filing 104 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc) |
Filing 50 ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For the reasons stated in the Order, Defendants' Motion is DENIED insofar as Defendants assert that Plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED with respect to the seventeen individual Defendants, who are hereby dismissed from this case. (cch) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.