Charan Mellor v. Solomon Entities Defined Benefit Pension Plan et al
| Charan Mellor |
| Kenneth A Solomon, Solomon Entities Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Does |
| 2:2012cv01380 |
| February 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees 86 is hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: Judgment be and hereby is entered in favor of Defendants Solomon Entities Defined Benefit Pension Plan, and ERISA plan, and Kenneth A. Solomon; Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his complaint against Defendants and the complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice; and Defendants may make a motion for attorneys' fees and costs., in favor of Solomon Entities Defined Benefit Pension Plan. (bp)
|
|
Filing
82
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds that defendants did not abuse their discretion in denying plaintiffs' request for additional benefits under the Plan. Defendants may make a motion for attorneys' fees and costs.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
