In Re: Rule 45 Subpoena Issued to Ramy Y. El-Batrawi
Petitioner: Ridge Clearing and Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.
Respondent: Ramy Y. El-Batrawi
In Re: Rule 45 Subpoena Issued to Ramy Y. El-Batrawi
Case Number: 2:2012cv01419
Filed: February 17, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Rule 45 Subpoena Issued to Ramy Y. El-Batrawi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ramy Y. El-Batrawi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Rule 45 Subpoena Issued to Ramy Y. El-Batrawi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ridge Clearing and Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Bryan J Freedman
Represented By: David Martin Marmorstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?