Cecilla E Gonzalez v. Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Cecilia E. Gonzalez
Defendant: Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC, Jennifer Nichole Hupe, Brad A. Mokri, Stephen Thomas Reheuser, Benjamin Alan Ganter and Christopher David Ganter
Case Number: 2:2012cv01816
Filed: March 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Plaintiff's Motion to strike Defendant's affirmative defense 36 is GRANTED. The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE affirmative defenses two, three, five through eight, ten through fifteen, and seventeen through nineteen. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE affirmative defenses one, four, nine, sixteen, and twenty because they are not affirmative defenses. Defendants may file an amended Answer within 10 days of the date of this order. (ir)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cecilla E Gonzalez v. Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecilia E. Gonzalez
Represented By: Fred W Schwinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer N Hupe
Represented By: Brad A Mokri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Nichole Hupe
Represented By: Jennifer N Hupe
Represented By: Brad A Mokri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad A. Mokri
Represented By: Jennifer N Hupe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Thomas Reheuser
Represented By: Jennifer N Hupe
Represented By: Brad A Mokri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin Alan Ganter
Represented By: Brad A Mokri
Represented By: Jennifer N Hupe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher David Ganter
Represented By: Brad A Mokri
Represented By: Jennifer N Hupe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?