Vicenson D Edwards v. Terri Gonzalez
Petitioner: Vicenson D Edwards
Respondent: Terri Gonzalez
Case Number: 2:2012cv02091
Filed: March 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 4 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). Pursuant to the Opinion and Order on a petition for writ of habeas corpus, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and action ARE SUMMARILY DISMISSED for lack of habeas jurisdiction. (mp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vicenson D Edwards v. Terri Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vicenson D Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Terri Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?