Guru Denim Inc v. Tri-Star Trading Inc et al
| Guru Denim Inc |
| Jenuine, Tri-Star Trading Inc and Does |
| 2:2012cv02163 |
| March 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. Pursuant to the Court's May 21, 2013 Order, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff Guru Denim, Inc. ("Plaintiff") against Defendant Tri-Star T rading, Inc. ("Tri-Star") in the amount of $500,000, plus costs., in favor of Guru Denim Inc against Tri-Star Trading Inc in the principal amount of $500,000, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $0.00. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
|
Filing
59
CONSENT INJUNCTION INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS STREET DENIM INC AND YOUSEFF ALTHEFUTI filed by Judge George H. King: Plaintiff and defendants have entered a settlement agreement a nd mutual release as to the claims. IT IS ORDERED that this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter. Plaintiff is the owner of the trademark registrations for work marks "TRUE RELIGION" and "TRUE RELIGION BRAND JEANS". De fendants ant their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation are permanently restrained from infringing upon Plaintiff's trademarks, either directly or contributorily in any manner including manufacturing, purchasing producing, distributing, circulating, selling, offering for sale, importing, exporting, advertising, etc. (See order for further details) (shb)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge George H. King. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rne)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Of Action With Prejudice As To Defendant Jenuine by Judge George H. King in favor of Guru Denim Inc against Jenuine: NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. WHEREAS Plaintiff G uru Denim, Inc. dba True Religion Brand Jeans and Defendant Jenuine have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to the claims in the above referenced matter. Defendant, having agreed to consent to the below terms, it is hereby as between plaintiff and defendant Jenuine only: Defendants and its agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Consent Decree are hereby permanently restrained and en joined from infringing upon Plaintiff's trademarks either directly or contributorily in any manner, including: (see document for further details). The jurisdiction of this Court is retained for the purpose of making any further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this Final Judgment, the enforcement thereof and the punishment of any violations thereof. Except as otherwise provided herein, this action is fully resolved with prejudice as to Defendant Jenuine. The Court hereby expressly directs entry of this judgment as against defendant Jenuine pursuant to FRCP 54(g) upon our express determination that there is no justification for delay in the entry of this judgment. Related to: Stipulation for Permanent Injunction, Stipulation to Dismiss Party 30 . (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
