United States of America et al v. Honeywell International Inc.
Daniel Thompson and United States of America |
Honeywell International Inc. |
2:2012cv02214 |
September 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Jay C. Gandhi |
John A. Kronstadt |
Other Statutory Actions |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 JUDGMENT DISMISSING FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Relator Daniel Thompson shall take nothing from Defendant Honeywell International Inc. by his Fourth Amended Complaint, and that the Fourth Amended Complaint shall be dismissed with Prejudice; provided, however, that it shall be dismissed without prejudice as to the United States of America. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb) |
Filing 58 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. It is HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COURT: This Protective Order shall govern the use and dissemination of all information, documents or materials that are designated as confidential and that are produced within this action. This order binds the parties and their respective agents, successors, personal representatives, and assignees. However, this Protective Order is not intended to govern the use of confidential information at any trial of this Action. (See Order for details) re Stipulation for Protective Order 52 (bem) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.