Rohmat Mulyana Jr. v. Atlantic Credit and Finance
Plaintiff: Rohmat Mulyana, Jr.
Defendant: Atlantic Credit and Finance
Case Number: 2:2012cv02217
Filed: March 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION AND ALL PARTIES, WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 23 , the Court orders as follows: That the lawsuit is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own costs and expenses. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rohmat Mulyana Jr. v. Atlantic Credit and Finance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rohmat Mulyana, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Atlantic Credit and Finance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?