In Re: Richard Alan Schoenfeld
Plaintiff: Hilda L. Solis
Defendant: Richard Alan Schoenfeld
In Re Debtor: Richard Alan Schoenfeld
Case Number: 2:2012cv02220
Filed: March 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero:1. Defendant Tomco Auto Products, Inc. and Defendant Richard Alan Schoenfeld are permanently enjoined from violatingthe provisions of Title I of ERISA; 2. Upon the appointment of an Independent Fiduciary as set forth below, Defendant Schoenfeld shall be permanently enjoined and restrained from serving as a fiduciary to any ERISA-covered employee benefit plan in the future; 3. Defendants Tomco and Schoenfeld are permanently enjoined from causing any assets to be r emoved from any account held in the name of the Plan. 4. An Independent Fiduciary will be appointed by this Court to manage and administer the Plan in accordance with ERISA for the benefit of the Plans participants and beneficiaries. The Secretary sh all have thirty days after the issuance of this Judgment to provide the Court with a motion seeking such appointment. On the date that this Court appoints the Independent Fiduciary, Defendants Tomco and Schoenfeld shall be required to pay all reasona ble fees and expenses necessary for the Independent Fiduciary tofulfill his or her obligations as set forth in this Judgment. 5. Once appointed, the Independent Fiduciary shall have the following powers, duties and responsibilities:(see document for specifics).6. Within fifteen days of the appointment of the Independent Fiduciary,Defendants Tomco and Schoenfeld shall be jointly and severally liable forproviding the Independent Fiduciary $69,511.36 in Plan losses caused bytheir fiduciary bre aches of ERISA. Postjudgment interest at the rate setforth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 shall continue to accrue on this debt to the Planuntil the entire amount due has been repaid. 7. Defendant Schoenfelds $69,000 debt to the Plan is non-dischargea ble under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4).8. This Judgment does not in any manner affect the right of the United StatesDepartment of Labor under 29 U.S.C. § 502(l) to assess a civil penaltyagainst such fiduciaries or other persons in an amount equal to 20 percent ofthe applicable recovery amount. Related to: MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant Tomco Auto Products, Inc (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Richard Alan Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re debtor: Richard Alan Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Alan Schoenfeld
Represented By: Katherine Butts Warwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hilda L. Solis
Represented By: Norman E Garcia
Represented By: Danielle L Jaberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?