In re: TV, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company
| Zfaty Burns and Isaac R. Zfaty |
| The City of El Monte |
| TV, LLC |
| 2:2012cv02222 |
| March 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: Before the Court is an appeal of an order issued by the Bankruptcy Court. Appellant City of El Monte ("El Monte") challenges the Bankruptcy Court's 3/5/2012 order denying El Monte's M otion for Order to Show Cause regarding contempt and sanctions. In its Opening Brief, El Monte states that this Court's jurisdiction "is based upon 28 U.S.C. Sections 157, 158(a)(1) and 1334." El Monte's Opening Brief does not pro vide any authority for the proposition that an order denying a motion for an order to show cause regarding contempt and sanctions is a final appealable order. The Court therefore orders El Monte to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. El Monte's response to this order to show cause shall be filed by 5/14/2012. Appellees shall include in their Appellees' Brief their position concerning this Courts jurisdiction over the appeal. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
