International Oddities Inc v. Domestic Oddities Wholesale Distribution LLC et al
| International Oddities Inc |
| Rick Chervenak, Domestic Oddities Wholesale Distribution LLC, Derek L Durbin, Eric C Fontenelle and Brett M McSpadden |
| 2:2012cv02259 |
| March 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Ralph Zarefsky |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
PERMANENT INJUNCTION BY CONSENT WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANTS DOMESTIC ODDITIES WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ERIC C. FONTENELLE, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND BRETT M. MCSPADDEN, AN INDIVIDUAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defend ants Domestic Oddities Wholesale Distribution, LLC ("Domestic Oddities"), Brett M. McSpadden ("McSpadden"), and Eric C. Fontenelle ("Fontenelle") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and all those persons in active concert, or participation, or affiliated with one or more of them or under authority of one or more of the Defendants who receive actual notice of this Agreement, shall to immediately cease and not resume at any time thereafter: (a) making , contributing to the making, or inducing others to make any use of a name, trade name, trademark, service mark, URL, domain name, or computer code which comprises or includes one or more of the Plaintiff's Trademarks or any reproduction, copy, counterfeit or colorable imitation thereof or any term(s) confusingly similar thereto, including, without limitation, the marks "DOMESTIC ODDITIES," "BLACK WIDOW," and/or "WHITE WIDOW," etc. The prevailing party in any proceeding to enforce the terms of this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction shall be entitled to recover the attorneys' fees and costs incurred therewith. See document for details. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (gk)
|
|
Filing
37
PERMANENT INJUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT DEREK L. DURBIN, AN INDIVIDUAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that upon entry of this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction, Defendant DEREK L. DURBIN, an in dividual ("Durbin"), and each of his employees, agents, servants, attorneys, successors and assigns and any entity he has an ownership interest in (unless it is a publicly traded company in which it/he owns or controls less than 5% of issued and outstanding voting stock, including any stock that could be converted into voting stock), controls directly or indirectly or for which he is an officer, director, or provides advice or direction, and all those in active concert and partici pation, or affiliated with one or more of them or under authority of Mr. Durbin who receive actual notice of this Permanent Injunction by personal service or otherwise, are hereby enjoined and restrained re the IO TRADEMARKS, etc. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBMISSION OF FORMS AO 120 (PATENT OR TRADEMARK) AND/OR AO 121 (COPYRIGHT) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing not later than 6/14/2012 why counsel ha s failed to submit the Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark and/or Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright in this action and why this action should not be dismi ssed for lack of prosecution. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument will not be held on this Order to Show Cause. The parties are advised that this action will be dismissed, unless prior to 6/14/2012, plaintiff files the Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Form AO 120) and/or Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright (Form AO 121), or show cause in writing as to why they should be excused from filing said report(s). Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
14
PERMANENT INJUNCTION WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT RICK CHERVENAK, AN INDIVIDUAL filed by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Consent, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: Defendant Rick Chervenak and each of his employees, agents, servants, succ essors and assigns and any entity he has an ownership interest in (unless it is a publicly traded company in which it/he owns or controls less than 5% of issued and outstanding voting stock, including any stock that could be converted into votin g stock), controls directly or indirectly or for which he is an officer, director, or provides advice or direction, and all those in active concert and participation, or affiliated with one or more of them or under authority of Mr. Chervenak who rece ive actual notice of this Permanent Injunction by personal service or otherwise, are hereby enjoined and restrained re any use of a name, tradename, mark, URL, domain name, or computer code which comprises or includes one or more of the IOTRADEMARKS or any reproduction, copy, counterfeit or colorable imitation thereof or any term(s) confusingly similar thereto, including without limitation the marks "DOMESTIC ODDITIES," "BLACK WIDOW," and/or "WHITE WIDOW," etc. The prevailing party in any proceeding to enforce the terms of this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction shall be entitled to recover the attorneys' fees and costs incurred therewith. See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
