Lagrimas Suarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Lagrimas Suarez
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation and Does
Case Number: 2:2012cv02993
Filed: April 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Margaret A. Nagle
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order Dismissing Defendant Cal-WesternReconveyance Corp. by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On November 8, 2012, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") as to why Defendant Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp. (" Cal-Western") should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The response to the OSC was due on November 28, 2012. Plaintiff failed to submit a response to the OSC, timely or otherwise. Therefore, the Court dismisses Defendant Cal-Western. re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive 28 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (lw)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Granting Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion for Attorneys' Fees by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees: Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS Wells Fargo's Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Wells Fargo is entitled to $1,500.00. (see document for further details) (bm)
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: In accordance with this Courts order filed on May 30, 2012, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. Judgment of dismissal with prejudice is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB ("Wells Fargo") and against plaintiff Lagrimas Suarez; 2. Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Wells Fargo; and 3. Wells Fargo shall be entitled to file motions to tax costs and for reasonable attorneys' fees. (bm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lagrimas Suarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lagrimas Suarez
Represented By: Art Hoomiratana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Viddell Lee Heard, Jr
Represented By: Jeremy E Shulman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation
Represented By: Robin P Wright
Represented By: Nicole K Neff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?