Maria Macias et al v. City of Long Beach et al
| Maria Macias and Lidia Amesquita |
| City of Long Beach and Does |
| 2:2012cv03113 |
| April 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: In the order following the Scheduling Conference, the Court ordered that Plaintiffs "shall file an amended complaint by no later than 9/24/2012" 10 . To date, and despite the expiration of the ir deadline to do so, Plaintiffs have not filed a First Amended Complaint. Despite Plaintiffs' counsel's failure to file a First Amended Complaint within the deadline he previously requested, the Court will allow Plaintiffs until 12:00 PM o n 10/12/2012, to file their First Amended Complaint. The failure to file a First Amended Complaint by that date and time may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice without further warning by the Court. Plaintiffs' counsel is or dered to show cause in writing no later than 12:00 PM on 10/12/2012, why he should not be sanctioned in an amount up to $500 for violating the Court's 9/17/2012 order that he file a First Amended Complaint by no later than 9/24/2012. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
