Damone L Hicks v. A Hedgpeth
Petitioner: Damone L Hicks
Respondent: A Hedgpeth
Case Number: 2:2012cv03451
Filed: April 20, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)
May 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE Dismissal of Petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody as time-barred by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/21/2012.) (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Damone L Hicks v. A Hedgpeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Damone L Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A Hedgpeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?