Jose Gonzalez v. Preferred Freezer Services, LBF, LLC et al
| Jose Gonzalez |
| Preferred Freezer Services, LBF, LLC and Does |
| 2:2012cv03467 |
| April 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Otis D Wright |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER VACATING HEARING :On the Courts own motion, the April 22, 2013 hearing Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class-Action Settlement (80] is hereby VACATED, and no appearances are necessary. Although the parties have not yet designated a Claims Administrator, they inform the Court that they are meeting and conferring and believe they will have selected one by April 22, 2013. The parties are therefore ORDERED to designate a claims administrator by April 22. The Court will thereafter issue an order on Plaintiffs motion by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 4/9/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court hereby CONTINUES the January 28, 2013 OSC hearing in this matter to March 11, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. This hearing will be vacated and the OSC discharged upon Plaintiffs filing of his motion for preliminary approval. (lc). Modified on 1/24/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR AN ORDER FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION 49 by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Preferred Freezer is therefore ORDERED to provide Gonzalez with the contact information of all of those prospective plaintiffs in this case with whom Preferred Freezer has had contact regarding settlement. Furthermore, any communication that either party has with putative plaintiffs must include the following information: (1) the name of this case; (2) the case number; (3) a summary of the basis of Gonzalezs claims; (4) the name of Gonzalezs attorneys and their contact information; and (5) a statement concerning the effect of executing Preferred Freezers released documents will have on its employees ability to participate in this lawsuit. (lc). Modified on 9/27/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Answer 11 by Judge Otis D Wright II. Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendants Answer is hereby GRANTED. Defendant shall file its amended Answer on or before July 20, 2012. (sch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
