Ronnie L Morgan Jr v. B Halbeisen et al
| Ronnie L Morgan, Jr |
| B Halbeisen, J Lane-Lewis, A Salandanan, E Tan, Valerie Ericksen, David Escalante, C Espinoza, D Baker, Does, Mr Dahli Wahl, Victor Flores, Leonardo Giron and Dr Gross |
| 2:2012cv03594 |
| April 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff Ronnie L Morgan, Jr Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 42 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ec)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Percy Anderson for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 16 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the claim alleged against defendant Halbeisen is dismissed wit hout leave to amend; (2) the Second Amended Complaint consists of a First Amendment retaliation claim alleged against defendant Flores and an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiffs serious medical needs against defendant Dhaliwal; and (3) the Second Amended Complaint is deemed to be so amended. The Magistrate Judge shall issue an appropriate Order regarding further proceedings. (mz)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND By Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle. (ec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
