Lance Harlan Van Horn v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Lance Harlan Van Horn v. Michael J Astrue

Lance Harlan Van Horn v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Lance Harlan Van Horn
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2012cv03686
Filed:	April 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge:	Josephine Staton Tucker
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2014	Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 25 . IT IS ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)
March 6, 2013	Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 20, 2013 by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, on or before March 20, 2013, Plaintiff shall show cause, if there be any, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff shall attempt to show such cause in writing by filing a declaration signed under penalty of perjury. In particular, Plaintiffs declaration must address why Plaintiff has failed to file his motion for summary judgment. Failure to timely file such a declaration or to show cause as ordered will result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Defendant shall inform Plaintiff of this order. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2014

Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 25 . IT IS ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

March 6, 2013

Filing 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 20, 2013 by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, on or before March 20, 2013, Plaintiff shall show cause, if there be any, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff shall attempt to show such cause in writing by filing a declaration signed under penalty of perjury. In particular, Plaintiffs declaration must address why Plaintiff has failed to file his motion for summary judgment. Failure to timely file such a declaration or to show cause as ordered will result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Defendant shall inform Plaintiff of this order. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lance Harlan Van Horn v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lance Harlan Van Horn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?