Rafael Rodarte v. Michael Stainer

Rafael Rodarte v. Michael Stainer

Petitioner:	Rafael Rodarte
Respondent:	Michael Stainer
Case Number:	2:2012cv03767
Filed:	May 1, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge:	R. Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 30, 2013	Filing 28 JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. 1 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
January 31, 2013	Filing 18 ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation 13 : IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Objections are overruled because the Court finds ground two was fairl y presented to the state high court and is exhausted for the reasons discussed in the R&R, the findings and recommendation of which are accepted. 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 6 is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the R&R. 3. Responde nt shall file an Answer within 45 days of this Order addressing the merits of the three claims in the Petition. Petitioner shall then file any related Reply within 30 days after service of Respondent' s Answer. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (rla)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 30, 2013

Filing 28 JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. 1 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

January 31, 2013

Filing 18 ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation 13 : IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Objections are overruled because the Court finds ground two was fairl y presented to the state high court and is exhausted for the reasons discussed in the R&R, the findings and recommendation of which are accepted. 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 6 is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the R&R. 3. Responde nt shall file an Answer within 45 days of this Order addressing the merits of the three claims in the Petition. Petitioner shall then file any related Reply within 30 days after service of Respondent' s Answer. The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (rla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rafael Rodarte v. Michael Stainer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rafael Rodarte
Represented By:	Sherilyn P McDonald
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Stainer
Represented By:	Roberta Lynn Davis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?