Mayella D Cervantes v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Mayella D Cervantes v. Michael J Astrue

Mayella D Cervantes v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Mayella D Cervantes
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2012cv03794
Filed:	May 2, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge:	R. Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 28, 2012	Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 21 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rp)
October 9, 2012	Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Although the deadline to file a motion for summary judgment or remand expired more than two weeks ago, to date, plaintiff has failed to require such a motion as required by the Case Management Order and the August 29, 2012 order. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than October 19, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecu tion and/or based upon plaintiff's failure to comply with the Case Management Order and the August 29, 2012 order. If the plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she must also file by a motion for summary judgment or remand by the foregoing deadline. (hr)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 28, 2012

Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 21 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rp)

October 9, 2012

Filing 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Although the deadline to file a motion for summary judgment or remand expired more than two weeks ago, to date, plaintiff has failed to require such a motion as required by the Case Management Order and the August 29, 2012 order. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than October 19, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecu tion and/or based upon plaintiff's failure to comply with the Case Management Order and the August 29, 2012 order. If the plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she must also file by a motion for summary judgment or remand by the foregoing deadline. (hr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayella D Cervantes v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mayella D Cervantes
Represented By:	Patricia L McCabe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?