Raul Aguayo et al v. Countywide KB Home Loans et al
| Lucila Aguayo and Raul Aguayo |
| BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Countywide KB Home Loans, Bank of America, N.A., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Does |
| 2:2012cv03813 |
| May 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W Fitzgerald: On 7/16/2012, the Court granted Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens (Docket No. 13). Plaintiffs Raul and L ucila Aguayo had not filed any opposition. The Court permitted the Aguayos to file an amended complaint within 14 days and warned that "[f]iling the amended complaint late by even one day will result in automatic dismissal of this action with pr ejudice." The deadline for the Aguayos to file an amended complaint was 7/30/0212. The Aguayos to date have not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The lis pendens the Aguayos recorded in the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office on October 28, 2011, as Instrument Number 20111461443 is EXPUNGED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
