California Justice Committee et al v.Debra Bowen
Constitution Party of California, Charles Michel Deemer, John Gabree, Jeff Norman and California Justice Committee |
Debra Bowen |
2:2012cv03956 |
May 7, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Voting |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiffs California Justice Committee, the Constitution Party of California, Jeff Norman, Charles Michel Deemer, and John Gabree (collectively "Plaintiffs" ) shall have judgment in their favor against defendant Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State, in her official capacity ("Defendant" or "Secretary of State"). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that California Electi ons Code section 5100's timing requirement violates Plaintiffs' rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Secretary of State is permanently enjo ined from enforcing or otherwise applying California Elections Code section 5100's requirement that proposed political parties must satisfy the party qualification requirements at least 135 days prior to the primary election. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.