Otter Products LLC v. Cellular Castle et al
| Otter Products LLC |
| OEM Planet, Cellular Castle, Infinite Trading Goods, Inc., Pantelis Chrysafis and Does |
| 2:2012cv04238 |
| May 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. The parties have failed to submit the required pretrial documents in preparation for the Pretrial Conference scheduled for May 17, 2013. Pursuant to Local Rule 16 and this Courts Scheduling Order, the pa rties were required to file pretrial documents with the Court no later than fourteen calendar days before the Pretrial Conference. The Scheduling Order specifically warned the parties that "the failure... to submit the required pretrial docume nts may result in the dismissal of the action, striking the answer and entering a default, and/or the imposition of sanctions." The parties have violated the Local Rules and this Court's Scheduling Order by failing to file all of the requ ired pretrial documents. Accordingly, the Court orders counsel to show cause in writing why they should not be sanctioned for failing to timely file the required pretrial documents. The parties' responses to this order to show cause shall be filed no later than May 16, 2013. Refer to document for details regarding the Court's order. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
