Pet Head Inc et al v. Skaffles Group LLC et al
| Kyara Mascolo and Pet Head Inc |
| Does, E S Sutton Inc, Fetch For Cool Pets LLC, Fetch LLC, Skaffles Group LLC and Skaffles LLC |
| 2:2012cv04519 |
| May 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Trademark |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (Attachments: # 1 Form AO-120) (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Kyara Mascolo, Pet Head Inc. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10 inclusive, E S Sutton Inc, Fetch For Cool Pets LLC, Fetch LLC, Skaffles Group LLC, Skaffles LLC. Case assigned to Judge John A Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F Eick.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Kyara Mascolo, Pet Head Inc. (et) |
| 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants E S Sutton Inc, Fetch For Cool Pets LLC, Fetch LLC, Skaffles Group LLC, Skaffles LLC. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
