Reynaldo Hernandez v. Rodolfo Avila Sandoval et al
| Reynaldo Hernandez |
| Los Altos Boots Inc, Rodolfo Avila Sandoval and Does |
| 2:2012cv04560 |
| May 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter in favor of defendants Rodolfo Avila Sandoval and Los Altos Boots, Inc. on plaintiff Reynaldo Hernandez's claims for com mon law trademark infringement, trademark infringement pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1114, and trademark infringement pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a). JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter in favor of counterclaimants Rodolfo Avila Sandoval and Los Altos Boots, Inc., and against counterclaim-defendant Reynaldo Hernandez, on counterclaimants' claims for Trademark Infringement and False Designation of Origin pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a). JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this m atter in favor of counterclaimants Rodolfo Avila Sandoval and Los Altos Boots, Inc., and against counterclaim-defendant Reynaldo Hernandez, on counterclaimants' claims for common law trademark infringement and unfair competition under the laws o f the state of California. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter in favor of counterclaimants Rodolfo Avila Sandoval and Los Altos Boots, Inc., and against counterclaim-defendant Reynaldo Hernandez, on counterclaimants' claims for unfair com petition pursuant to Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Sections 17200 et seq. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter in favor of counterclaimants Rodolfo Avila Sandoval and Los Altos Boots, Inc., and against counterclaim-defendant Reynaldo Hernandez, on coun terclaimants' claim for cancellation of trademark registration. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 1119, the Court directs the United States Patent and Trademark Office to cancel U.S. Registration No. 3,902,986. Counterclaim-defendant Reynaldo Hernandez is ORDERED to pay $32,477.00 in damages for his infringement of the ORIGINAL MICHEL trademarks. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
97
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendants' Ex Parte Application 95 is hereby GRANTED. The deadline to hold the pre-trial conference of counsel is extended to 5/19/2014, and the deadline for pre-trial disclosures is extended to 5/27/2014. Defendants' request for a bench trial is also granted. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
93
PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER filed by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Counterdefendant Reynaldo Hernandez, together with his principals, affiliates, licensees, manufacturers, importers, partners, managers, suppliers, ag ents, attorneys, employees, employers, representatives, successors, assigns, transferees, and all persons acting in concert or participation with him, or at his direction, or within his control, shall be permanently enjoined and restrained as to the ORIGINAL MICHEL M SINCE 1970 and ORIGINAL MICHEL trademarks or any other name or mark confusingly similar to ORIGINAL MICHEL M SINCE 1970 and ORIGINAL MICHEL, etc. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
75
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court recognizes that plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and therefore on its own motion continues the hearing date on defendants Los Altos Boo ts, Inc. and Rodolfo Avila Sandoval filed a motion for summary judgment as to both their counterclaims and plaintiffs claims 60 to 3/24/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder. Plaintiff's opposition shall be due 3/3/2014. Defendants' reply shall be due 3/10/2014. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to file an opposition by 3/3/2014 shall be deemed consent to the granting of defendants' motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-12. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
59
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: On 12/5/2013, plaintiff filed a motion to suppress the deposition of Mario Cervantes Retamoza, a non-party, on the grounds that Retamoza failed to provide sufficient answers to several of plaintiff& #039;s questions during the deposition 53 . Defendants filed a request to have plaintiff refile his motion due to deficiencies in the joint stipulation. Defendants also request a continuance of the hearing date so that they may adequately respond to plaintiff's arguments, as well as an award of attorney's fees as a sanction for plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirements of Local Rule 37 55 . plaintiff's motion is DENIED without prejudice to being renewed if plainti ff obtains an order from the Magistrate Judge compelling Retamoza's testimony, and such order is not obeyed. The factual discovery cutoff, previously scheduled for 9/26/2013, is hereby extended to 2/18/2014, for the limited purpose of permitting plaintiff to bring a motion to compel before the Magistrate Judge. Defendants' request for attorney's fees is DENIED on the grounds that plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and may not be intimately familiar with the Local Rules and General Orders of this Court. Defendants' request for a continuance of the hearing on this motion is DENIED as moot. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Based on Plaintiff's failure to cooperate and pay attorney's fees, the Court concludes that counsel has made a sufficient showing of good cause, and thus hereby GRANTS Chris Papageorge's motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff Reynaldo Hernandez 46 . Counsel is hereby ordered to provide plaintiff with notice of the Court's order in accordance with Local Rule 83-2.9.2.3. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing
42
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 39 ; See order for details. (jy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
