United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Crane Financial and Insurance Agency Inc et al
| United of Omaha Life Insurance Company |
| Marie Kalungi, Robinah Kayongo, Ronald Kayongo, Damiano Kigoye, Ronald Lukwago, Michael Chibueze Monday, Adrien Muya, Regius Nambooze, Evelyn Namujulirwa, Crane Financial and Insurance Agency Inc and Mohammed Kakooza |
| 2:2012cv04614 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, in favor of United of Omaha Life Insurance Company against Adrien Muya, Evelyn Namujulirwa, Marie Kalungi, Michael Chibueze Monday, Regius Nambooze, Robinah Kayongo, Ronald Kayongo, Ronald Lukwago. the Court enters judgment against each of the Defendants in the following amounts: 1. Defendant Robinah Kayongo in the amount of $3,325.38. 2. Defendant Marie Kalungi in the amount of $14,656.93. 3. Defendant Ronald Kayongo in the amount of $24,059.78 . 4. Defendant Ronald Lukwago in the amount of $28,086.80. 5. Defendant Michael Chibueze Monday in the amount of $9,578.72. 6. Defendant Regius Nambooze in the amount of $10,009.89. 7. Defendant Adrien Muya in the amount of $32,321.72. 8. Defendant Evelyn Namujulirwa in the amount of $53,402.18. The clerk shall close this action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jre) (Main Document 133 replaced on 10/15/2013) (jre).
|
|
Filing
76
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accor dingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than December 28, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendants' Answers to the First Amended Complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendants; AND Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendant Damiano Kigoye. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause within 7 days as to why this Action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Damiano Kigoye for lack of prosecution. The Court will accept one of the following as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: (1) Defendant Kigoyes Answer to Complaint or (2) Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default by Clerk on this Defendant. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
