Dale Egelhoff et al v. Pacific Lightwave et al
Dale Egelhoff and Laurie Eglehoff |
Allison Bojkovsky, Simon Bojkovsky, Cove Electric Inc, Does and Pacific Lightwave |
2:2012cv04745 |
May 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David T Bristow |
R. Gary Klausner |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 200 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED Pursuant to the jury verdict rendered in this matter July 12, 2013 148 , and Plaintiff DALE EGELHOFF'S subsequent motions for attorneys' fees and pre judgment interest: 1. Plaintiff DALE EGELHOFF is awarded final judgment against Defendant PACIFIC LIGHTWAVE, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION in the amount of $151,836.40, consisting of: A. Damages as found by the jury of $106,494.23; B. Attorneys fees of $20,150.00; and C. Prejudgment interest of $25,192.17. 2. Plaintiffs DALE EGELHOFF and LAURIE EGELHOFF are awarded nothing against Defendants SIMON BOJKOVSKY and ALLISON BOJKOVSKY. (lom) |
Filing 175 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Pursuant to the Jury verdict rendered in this matter 7/12/13 148 . Plaintiff Dale Egelhoff is awarded final judgment against Defendant Pacific Lightwave, a California corporation in the amount of $106,494.23, plus costs as prevailing party. Plaintiffs Dale Egelhoff and Laurie Egelhoff are awarded nothing against Defendants Simon Bojkovsky and Allison Bojkovsky. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.