Candy Spelling v. Fleetville Group Ltd et al
| Candy Spelling |
| Does and Fleetville Group Ltd |
| 2:2012cv04822 |
| June 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Contract: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Fleetville Group Ltd, re Notice of Removal, 1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement 3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) 4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties 2 , Civil Cover Sheet, Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistriate Judge, Notice to Counsel, USDC Central District of CA Clerk's Office Services for Attorneys and General Public, and PACER Information served on 06/06/12. (Gnanadesigan, Abirami) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Fleetville Group Ltd. (et) (mg). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fleetville Group Ltd. (et) (mg). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the CA for the County of Los Angeles-Wet District, case number SC116862 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Margaret M. Morrow, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID. ), filed by Defendant Fleetville Group Ltd.(et) (mg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
