Khalil Zaghian v. THQ Inc et al
| Khalil Zaghian |
| Brian J Farrell, Paul J Pucino and THQ Inc |
| 2:2012cv05227 |
| June 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Manuel L. Real: Upon the motion of the Lead Plaintiff for final approval of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated 4/21/2017 81 , IT IS HEREBY ORDER ED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, just, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class. The Court hereby dismisses the Litigation and all Settled Claims of the Settlement Class with prejudice, without costs as to any Settling Party. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
46
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Order re: Request for Further Briefing. The Parties' briefing so far contains insufficient information for the Court to determine whether any D&O policy exists. Accordingly, Defendants Farrell an d Pucino are hereby ORDERED to submit supplemental briefing indicating whether they might be protected by any D&O policy, and whether such a policy might be considered property of the THQ estate. The Court also notes that THQ has not yet been formall y dismissed; although a notice of dismissalwas lodged, it was not filed, and therefore has not yet taken effect. Since they are still involved in this case, the Court ORDERS THQ to file its own supplemental briefing addressing these issues. If a D&O policy exists, THQ should provide it to the Court. The Parties briefing may be no more than 5 pages, excluding exhibits, and should be submitted no later than Friday, October 3, 2014. The hearing on Plaintiff's pending motion 44 is hereby CONTINUED to Monday, October 20, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Gary A. Feess. See document for details. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
