Mary Rios v. LAX Parking Center Inc et al
| Mary Rios |
| Does, LAX Parking Center Inc and Arnel Investments LLC |
| 2:2012cv05475 |
| June 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. At the final pretrial conference on April 5, 2013, Plaintiffs counsel acknowledged that (1) Plaintiff herself has never visited Defendants premises, and (2) that Margarita Kouzel, who inspected Defendant s premises to determine its compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), was not disclosed to Defendant (or even hired by Plaintiff) until April 1, 2013, the Monday prior to the final pretrial conference and five weeks after the di scovery cutoff date. In light of Plaintiffs failure to disclose (or even hire) Margarita Kouzel a witness essential to Plaintiffs prima facie case given that Plaintiff herself never actually visited Defendants premises until four days prior to the final pretrial conference, and well after the close of discovery, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing no later than 3:00 p.m. on Thursday April 11, 2013, why she and her counsel should not be sanctioned pursuant to Rule 37 and Rule 11, respectively, including by the striking of the Complaint in its entirety. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
