Controversy Music et al v. Vincent Anthony Nanci
Plaintiff: Controversy Music, EMI April Music Inc, Lellow Productions and Universal Music Corporation
Defendant: Vincent Anthony Nanci
Case Number: 2:2012cv05533
Filed: June 25, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: George H. King
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King, in favor of Controversy Music, EMI April Music Inc, Lellow Productions, Universal Music Corporation against Vincent Anthony Nanci: Pursuant to the Court's October 11, 2012 Order, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DEC REED that default judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs in the following amounts: 1. Statutory damages of $3,000 for copyright infringement for each work, for a total or $12,000.00. 2. Attorney's fees in the amount of $ ;2,362.30; 3. Costs of this action; and 4. Post-judgment interest as permitted by 28 U.S.C. 1961. It is further ORDERED that Defendant and his respective agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those persons or entities in active participation a nd concert with them, are hereby enjoined from publicly performing, or causing or permitting to be publicly performed, in their business establishment known as Anthony's Lounge and Ristorante, located at 24630 Washington Ave., Suite 100, Murrietta, California 92562, or in any other place owned, controlled, or operated by Defendant, any copyrighted musical compositions owned by Plaintiffs, without first obtaining proper authorization to do so. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Controversy Music et al v. Vincent Anthony Nanci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Controversy Music
Represented By: Amie L Medley
Represented By: Sharon Douglass Mayo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMI April Music Inc
Represented By: Sharon Douglass Mayo
Represented By: Amie L Medley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lellow Productions
Represented By: Sharon Douglass Mayo
Represented By: Amie L Medley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Universal Music Corporation
Represented By: Sharon Douglass Mayo
Represented By: Amie L Medley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vincent Anthony Nanci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?