Shenzhen Gampaq Technology Co. v. Playhut, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Shenzhen Gampaq Technology Co.
Defendant: Playhut, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2012cv05793
Filed: July 5, 2012
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Stephen J Hillman
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2012 Filing 9 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. KC063941 G, acknowledged on 7/23/2012. (gk)
July 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: On 7/262012, the Court issued an order provisionally remanding this action to the Los Angeles Superior Court as a result of procedural defects in the Notice of Removal #7 . In its 7/2/2012 order, the Court stayed the order remanding the action to provide plaintiff with an opportunity to object to the remand and waive the procedural defects. Specifically, plaintiff was directed to inform the Court in writing by 7/16/2012 if it objected to the remand. To date, despite the passage of the deadline set by the Court, plaintiff has not waived the procedural defects. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the 7/2/2012 order, this action is remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. KC063941. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (Attachments: #1 CV-103 Remand Transmittal Letter) (gk)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: The fact that Defendant is a California citizen renders the Notice of Removal procedurally defective under the "local defendant" limitation on removals. Accordingly, this action is remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. KC063941, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. The Court stays this order until 7/16/2012. If Plaintiff wishes to remain in federal court and thereby waive the procedural defect discussed above, Plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing on or before 7/16/2012. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
July 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. All counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California. See document for further details. (gk)
July 5, 2012 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(esa)
July 5, 2012 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Playhut, Inc., Civil Cover Sheet, Notice of Removal, Certification as to Interested Parties, Declaration, Proof of Service, served on 7/5/12. (esa) (mg).
July 5, 2012 Filing 3 DECLARATION of TINA ABRANTE filed by Defendant Playhut, Inc. (esa) (mg).
July 5, 2012 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AS TO INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Playhut, Inc. (esa) (mg).
July 5, 2012 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Superior Court of CA, Los Angeles County, case number KC063941 with CONFORMED copies of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson, discovery to Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman; (Filing fee $ 350 PAID ); filed by defendant Playhut, Inc.(esa) (mg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shenzhen Gampaq Technology Co. v. Playhut, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shenzhen Gampaq Technology Co.
Represented By: John D Guerrini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Playhut, Inc.
Represented By: James J Moak
Represented By: Jason A James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?