Jose Manuel Cabadas v. Washington-Aducci
Petitioner: Jose Manuel Cabadas
Respondent: Warden Washington-Aducci
Case Number: 2:2012cv05798
Filed: July 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, Related to: Order Dismissing, 4 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Manuel Cabadas v. Washington-Aducci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Manuel Cabadas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Washington-Aducci
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?