George Bustamante v. United States of America
Petitioner: George Bustamante
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2012cv06002
Filed: July 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS SEEKING RELIEF PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) 1 . Petitioners Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Motion Requesting Evidentiary Hearing 13 , 14 are also DENIED by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc). Modified on 9/25/2014 .(lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: George Bustamante v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Dorothy Kim
Represented By: Sarah C Levitt
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George Bustamante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?