Serzhik Sargsyan v. Unifund Government Services LLC et al
Serzhik Sargsyan |
Credit Control LLC, Delanor Kemper and Associates LLC, Enhanced Recovery Company LLC, IC System Inc, Northstar Location Services LLC, Pinnacle Credit Services LLC, Resurgent Capital Services LP, Unifund Government Services LLC, Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC, Convergent Outsourcing Inc and Asset Acceptance LLC |
2:2012cv06291 |
July 20, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L. Real |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Consumer Credit |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of defendant Unifund and against Arshak Bartoumian in the amount of $2,175.18. Arshak Bartoumian, shall pay Unifund within 30 days of the entry of this judgment. (bp) |
Filing 66 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff shall take nothing by Plaintiff's complaint and defendant Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. is hereby DISMISSED from this action, WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's counsel, Arshak Bartoumian, shall pay to defendant Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. the amount of $10,148.65., in favor of Resurgent Capital Services LP against Serzhik Sargsyan in the principal amount of $10,148.65, interest in the amount of $-, attorneys fees of $-, costs of $- for a total judgment of $10,148.65. Related to: MOTION for Attorney Fees 57 . (lom) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.