Diane Ballou v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
| Diane Ballou |
| Does, LAPD Officer Gary, Los Angeles Police Department, LAPD Investigator S. Stallworth and LAPD Detective Stirwalt |
| 2:2012cv06324 |
| July 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court hereby AMENDS its previous Order to Show Cause. (ECF No. 31.) The Court has no interest in monitoring parties compliance with the terms of a settlement agreement. Given that the se parties have settled the matter, this case should be dismissed. Any failure to satisfy the terms of the parties settlement agreement, including payment, should be enforced in a subsequent lawsuit. Therefore, the Court ORDERS the parties to show cause, by May 1, 2013 at 1:30 pm, why the parties cannot stipulate to dismissal of this case. This OSC hearing will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal. (lc). Modified on 4/25/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 17 . The parties must have met and conferred no later than yesterday (December 17) to prepare a joint Rule 26(f), which must be filed no later than Monday, December 24, 2012. (See ECF No. 1 4.) Failure to file a joint Rule 26(f) report on or before December 24 will result in dismissal of this action.The January 7, 2012 scheduling conference, however, is hereby VACATED,and no appearances are necessary. The Court will set a case-management schedule in this matter on the basis of the parties 26(f) report by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 12/18/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 5 by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 9/25/2012 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
