Emily Wakeling v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Emily Wakeling
Defendant: Does and Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 2:2012cv06541
Filed: July 30, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary A. Feess
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER re DISMISSAL by Judge Gary A. Feess, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 22 . Having reviewed the Stipulation Re Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 entered by and between plaintiff Emily Wakeling and defendant Starbucks Corpo ration, and finding good cause therein, the Court hereby orders as follows: (i) plaintiffs individual claims against Starbucks are dismissed with prejudice, (ii) the putative class claims against Starbucks are dismissed without prejudice, and (iii) each side to bear her or its own attorneys' fees and costs to achieve said dismissal. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)
October 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh GRANTING Stipulation for Protective Order, 14 . (ca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emily Wakeling v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Mark Royce Curiel
Represented By: Gregory W Knopp
Represented By: Galit A Knotz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Wakeling
Represented By: Gregory N Karasik
Represented By: Michael Nourmand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?