Celine Tran v. Shad Gregory Moss et al
| Celine Tran |
| Does, Shad Gregory Moss and Universal Music Group Inc |
| 2:2012cv06551 |
| July 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER AND JUDGMENTPURSUANT TO STIPULATION 53 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. 1) Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiff is entitled to recover from Defendant: a. The sum of $51,666.67 on Plaintiff's Complaint, subject to the terms of the Stipu lation; b. The sum of $13,918.00 in reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Judgment; and c. Any future reasonable attorney fees and costs that may be fu rther incurred in connection with the enforcement of the Court's Judgment. 2. No Appeals and Continuing Jurisdiction. No appeals shall be taken from this Judgment, and all parties waive all rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce any violation of the terms of this Judgment. All pending dates are vacated. The Clerk shall close this action. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (jre)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER re Defendant Shad Gregory Moss's Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment 24 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Because service on Defendant was improper, the default judgment is void, and the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion 24 . The Clerk shall close this action (CV 16-1214). The parties shall continue to litigate and file documents in Case No. CV 12-6551, including Defendants answer, due on or before June 3, 2016. (jre)
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew re ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accor dingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than OCTOBER 31, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the C ourt will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant Shad Gregory Moss' Answer to Complaint or Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default on defendant. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
