Taras Volgemut v. Dieter P Abt
Plaintiff: Taras Volgemut
Defendant: Dieter P Abt
Case Number: 2:2012cv06678
Filed: August 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Clerk, in favor of Taras Volgemut against Dieter P Abt in the principal amount of $1000000, interest in the amount of $79743.97, attorneys fees of $23600., costs of $503.86 for a total judgment of $1103847.83. Related to: Amendment (Motion related) 10 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taras Volgemut v. Dieter P Abt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taras Volgemut
Represented By: Julie J Roback
Represented By: Jeffrey B Valle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dieter P Abt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?