One 3 Two Inc v. Akame Inc et al
| One 3 Two Inc |
| Does, Eugene Okorie and Akame Inc |
| 2:2012cv06836 |
| August 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Otis D Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS RE PLAINTIFFS MARKS ETC AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ; plaintiff and defendants bedar their own ocsts and attorney fees by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (see document for specifics). (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING WANGER & ASSOCIATES' MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 27 , 28 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court therefore GRANTS Wagner & Associates' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. (ECF Nos. 27, 289.) Wagner is ORDERED to serve a copy of this Order on all parties and file proof of service with the Court. (bp)
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II re ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 30, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prose cution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendants. In the event both documents are filed before the abo ve date, the answer will take precedence; Answer by the defendant(s). In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
