Aaron Sperske v. Ariel Rosenberg et al
| Aaron Sperske |
| Ariel Pinks Haunted Graffiti, Kenneth John Gilmore, Kwang Nam Koh and Ariel Rosenberg |
| 2:2012cv07034 |
| August 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: that Sperskes Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED 62 . The Court also VACATES the default judgment previously entered against Ariel Pinks Haunted Graffiti on October 23, 2012 34 . (lc). Modified on 7/23/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT Defendant Ariel Rosenbergs MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEFAULT JUDGMENT 39 by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 12/7/2012 (lc).
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D Wright, II. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should notbe dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff shall file a noticed motion for default judgment against Defendan ts Ariel Pinks Haunted Graffiti and Kwang Nam Koh. And as for Defendants Ariel Rosenberg and Kenneth John Gilmore (assuming he does not respond in time), Plaintiff shall file a request for entry of default. Plaintiff shall file all of these papers no later than October 19, 2012. No hearing is scheduled. Failure to follow this order will result in dismissal of this case. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
